Under Tony Blair, the Department for International Development has been well served by it’s Secretaries of State. Clare Short, Hillary Benn and even the short-lived Valerie Amos all displayed a passion for the work and a commitment to International Development. Douglas Alexander may have a problem displaying the same level of passion, or if history is anything to go by, any passion at all.
But he’ll need it. The public has been swept along in recent years by talk of helping the poorest people in the world. But as the UK’s spending on development climbs towards 0.7 percent of GDP the call for charity may not be enough. People will sooner or later will look for something more for their money.
People want to see a permanent end to poverty that will not require developed countries to sustain it. In the long-term, economic growth is the only sustainable way forward. The danger is that a focus on poverty reduction as a short term goal may interfere with this.
In large part because of the dedication and understanding of DFID ministers in the last 10 years, the UK government has avoided many of these pitfalls and kept its focus on more sensible goals which fight poverty and promote growth. The temptation for a new minister, and especially a careerist on the way up, must be to go for immediate prestige projects such as giving large amounts of direct budget support for education or health.
But this won’t help in the long run. So hopefully, Douglas Alexander will be able to keep his personal ambitions out of the equation and concentrate on maintaining the record of one of the best performing government departments.
From Adam Smith Institute
Tags: Libertarian, Politics, Liberty, Freedom