Marek touches upon Richard Layard’s research into happiness and the policy suggestions he derives from such. Given the Noble Lord’s proclivities, this includes greater redistribution through the tax code.
However, it’s possible to take the same results of the research and come up with equally valid but quite different policy recommendations.
At the heart of the analysis is the point that above a certain level more money doesn’t make us happy. Leave aside for the moment the validity of this statement or not and let us assume that it is correct. We’ll also take Layard’s identification of some £12,000 a year as being the cut off point. We’ll even agree that the maximisation of possible happiness should be the purpose of the tax and benefit system.
So, our first point would be that no one earning less than £12,000 should be taxed upon it, as this will clearly make them less happy. Fortunately, the ASI is already recommending this, with a personal tax allowance of this size.
Secondly, as above this point there is no happiness/unhappiness point to be made about taxing the rich at higher rates than those not so much, we should have a flat tax if only for simplicity’s sake. This the ASI also proposes in the same report.
Finally, there should be no redistribution to those making more than £12,000 a year as this will not make them happier. This has not yet been suggested by the ASI, well, until just now.
So, the end of most of the welfare state (as most of it goes to those with more than £12,000 a year), a more than doubling of the personal allowance and a flat tax: go on, it’ll make you happier, Richard Layard says so.
From Adam Smith Institute
Tags: Libertarian, Politics, Liberty, Freedom