Blog Review 553

An excellent little map showing the conditions on the ground during the election in Zimbabwe.

A very odd idea, that markets do not cater to minorities. Are we not all a minority of one?

How to make a fortune running a hedge fund. Alternatively, don’t invest with someone who claims to have read The Black Swan.  

Given the errors people keep finding in the statistics on global warming, might it not be a good idea that the raw materials be released?   

A little change in Parliamentary procedures. Apparently an MEP holding the executive to account by asking a question now amounts to abuse.

The Ban Darling campaign impresses the Spaniards (translation here).

And finally, blogger proposes marriage (to Wendy Alexander?) and why there are more engineers in terrorist cells than sociologists. 

From Adam Smith Institute

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 3:11 pm

About those hedge funds

The Telegraph has a nice piece about the hedge funds and Brad Delong comments upon it here. All very interesting but still missing one vital point: that the current blowups amongst hedge funds are exactly the way this liberal capitalism, this market allocation of investment, is supposed to work.

Start at the beginning, decades ago: some bright sparks noted that excess returns (that is, above the risk adjusted normal profit rate) could be had by arbitraging in the markets. It might have been bonds against stocks, or debts of different maturities, or currencies and loans: doesn’t matter. They thus invested in such arbitrage trades and in the process of making themselves a great deal of money they smoothed out these market inefficiencies.

Those excess returns were spotted by other investors, of course, and they acted as a signal that perhaps investing in the same business could bring more of those highly desirable profits. This is what we actually want to happen, that resources are applied to their highest known value usage: it’s the very definition of wealth creation when an asset moves from a low to a higher value use.

At some point enough investors note these potential excess profits and thus they are competed away. There’s enough, or more than enough (for markets do sadly tend to overshoot) capital now working in this sector and of course the returns to it fall.

We might thus end up with what we actually desire: the sector as a whole makes normal risk adjusted returns, clearly with some making good decisions and thus good profits, others less so. The whole economy has been made more efficient (and thus wealthier) by the elimination of those imperfections that led to the arbitrage opportunities and the bright sparks go off to look for another similar opportunity to allocate capital to its most productive use.

What’s not to like about this?   

From Adam Smith Institute

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 6:03 am

Common Error No. 77

77. "We must subsidize our industries, to compete with foreigners who do the same to theirs."

We want industries that can compete on world markets. They can do that by matching the products of their rivals in both quality and price, and by learning to adapt quickly to changing market conditions and being able to spot emerging opportunities. When foreigners subsidize their industries they are making them depend on government aid rather than on their own qualities. Industries so supported become complacent, finding it easier to get government funds than to adapt to competitive markets.

In an ideal world we would buy the subsidized goods from abroad, being grateful that foreign taxpayers were stupid enough to send us cheap goods. If they pay higher taxes it limits their own economy, and if they do it for our benefit we might be grateful for their largesse. The lower prices we paid would leave us more resources to spend on other things, which means richer.

In this less-than-ideal world, foreigners sometimes subsidize their exports in order to drive our domestic competition out of business. That domestic industry clamours for equivalent assistance to secure a level field, and we end up in a world where everyone is worse off.

Far better in the first instance to secure international agreements against this kind of predatory dumping. The World Trade Organization has gradually proved effective at ending this beggar-my-neighbour attitude which only holds back wealth creation and economic expansion. It requires countries which sign up to its great benefits to desist from the subsidies which bedevil trade.

When we suspect that subsidized goods are flooding into our markets, the correct response is to insist on compliance with WTO rules. The worst response is to subsidize our own producers in retaliation. This helps neither the taxpayers who have to support it, nor the businesses which then become dependent on continuing government support.

From Adam Smith Institute

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 6:02 am

America’s tax freedom

I keep an eye out for web mentions of Tax Freedom Day – that day in the year when we at last stop working for the tax authorities and at last start working for ourselves. And over the last couple of weeks, I’ve spotted lots and lots of mentions, because Tax Freedom Day arrives this month.

If you’re an American, that is. The Tax Foundation has calculated that Tax Freedom Day this year will fall on April 23. That’s three days earlier than in 2007, thanks to President Bush’s tax rebates, designed to kick-start the US economy. But it’s still later than it was during the whole of the 1980s (thanks, Mr Reagan) and the early years of the George W Bush administration.

None of this is any consolation to hard-pressed British taxpayers, though. Tax Freedom Day doesn’t come in the UK until June 2 this year. That’s also a little earlier than last year, but the general trend has been upwards in the UK for some long time.

So as the Americans are heading off to the beach to celebrate their liberation from taxes on April 23, we Brits will still be slaving away for the benefit of HM Revenue & Customs. Slaving for nearly another six weeks, in fact. Isn’t that just too long to be in thrall to our political masters?

From Adam Smith Institute

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 6:01 am

My one is bigger than yours

Now this is something I look forward to seeing, at least virtually: The Mile High Tower will be double the height of its nearest rival, and will be almost seven times the height of the Canary Wharf tower in London. Visitors will be able to see Africa from the top of the tower, the Sunday Times newspaper reports […] The project will push architecture and engineering to new limits, as the tower must be robust…

From Samizdata.net

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 4:00 am

The big dithering fist

I do not always follow politics. When things are going well for politicians I do not like I prefer not to think about it. But now, I am thinking quite a lot about Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister. Two labels have been attached to Gordon Brown, in succession. First, there was the big clunking fist metaphor. But now, this picture of a grim but determined, horrid by decisive individual, has been replaced by a…

From Samizdata.net

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 4:00 am

Youth crime in Britain

Blogger Clive Davis, who is well known to us at Samizdata, has this distressing report about an attack by youths on his teenage son. He's not been impressed by the response by the police. It will not ease Clive's anger one jot to hear that I had exactly the same experience when I was mugged in Clapham nine years ago. The police jotted down some comments, took a statement from me, including a description of…

From Samizdata.net

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 4:00 am

A date for your diary

London and the Database State A mayoral hustings organised by NO2ID Londoners are among the most watched people on earth. As well as housing Whitehall, Parliament and the other self-protecting security apparatus, London has many information and identity management systems of its own. How do candidates feel about the civil liberties and privacy implications of, among other things, the Oyster Card, congestion charging, telephone parking? Would they support or oppose national ID schemes as mayor?…

From Samizdata.net

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Monday 31 March 2008 at 4:00 am

Earth Hour — What They SHOULD Have Said

Allow me to engage in a bit of strawman-bashing. In the comments to Don Boudreaux’s excellent post at Cafe Hayek, a rather idiotic argument came up. It is the same argument that many of our own contributors received when we opposed Ron Paul, and commenters told us “If you don’t like Ron Paul, […]

From The Liberty Papers

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Sunday 30 March 2008 at 7:30 pm

Blog Review 552

Clearly something is amiss when a Liberian Imam knows more about statistical testing than an English County Council.

This isn’t illegal (yet) although it is highly amusing. 

Lord of the Rings is really a discourse upon property righs. You didn’t know that, did you? 

Some backpedalling upon the immediate and catastrophic part of climate change. The most remakable part of the whole subject is the way in which what the scientists are saying and what the politicians are saying has diverged in recent years.

The obligatory Ban Darling update. 

Markets really do work better than bureaucracies. 

And finally, yes, prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. They even missed the idea of a blog post dedicated to 404 error pages. 

From Adam Smith Institute

Tags: , , ,

Blogged under Libertarian News on Sunday 30 March 2008 at 11:02 am
Next Page »

Proudly powered by Wordpress